Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
10
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Firm considers licensing method to transform gas into plastic products[2016/11/03]
-
Apple's iPhone 7 Lands in Last Place in Battery Life Test[2016/10/04]
-
AM Alert: Plastic bags’ environmental impact debated[2016/10/18]
-
With the coming of the new energy automobile, what is the future of traditional energy vehicles?[2018/03/09]
-
Apple is working on iPhone batteries that last longer and don’t explode[2016/10/08]
-
Battery power unviable alternative to traditional energy sources[2016/10/25]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]
-
?Samsung apologizes to Galaxy Note 7 customers[2016/11/09]
-
Japanese battery maker TDK reels from Samsung Note 7 debacle[2016/10/12]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
Comparative Analysis: The cost of new power generation in South Africa[2016/10/22]
-
The cost of plastic packaging[2016/10/18]